I did created a flexmojos-spices project on git hub.... you could share a
sample project there....
http://github.com/Flexmojos/flexmojos-recipes


Lemme know what you think.


VELO

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Bryan Turner <[email protected]>wrote:

> My project is using flexmojos:generate to code-generate several hundred
> model classes. We've also made (unfortunately) heavy use of generics (mostly
> incorrectly), and enums, and inheritance, and more. In my opinion, it is the
> best way to ensure that your client and server models stay in sync, which is
> very important with AMF calls.
>
> We do not check any of our generated model in. In fact, to help ensure
> this, we generate the model under target/, which is in our svn:ignore set.
> Because GAS has support for customizing the generated output, both with the
> templates it uses to emit ActionScript and with the generated files
> themselves, we check customized (by hand) model classes in under
> src/main/flex. We the use a quick antrun to copy src/main/flex to
> target/src/as3 before flexmojos:generate runs. This gives us the best of
> both worlds: Customizable model classes which are code-generated from the
> Java to keep them in sync.
>
> I'd be happy to post some chunks of that pom.xml. The only issues we've run
> into so far have been with Granite and some of the bad decisions in our
> object model (and we've been able to overcome them all). FlexMojos GAS
> integration has worked splendidly. While your object model is small now, it
> will most likely grow with time. This is a good thing to setup early and get
> your team used to. It will save you a lot of hassle later.
> > I've got a BlazeDS back-end up and running and now I am looking at
> > creating ActionScript service and value object classes. I have about
> > 30 Java entities spread across 7-8 service classes -- so not too many,
> > but not a trivial app either.
> >
> > I am enticed by the generate goal which I understand is built on
> > Granite Gas3.
> >
> > There are many graphs within my entities, and extensive use of
> > generics, but limited use of enums. Would I be better off just hand
> > coding these things or should I rely on the code generator?
> >
> > A related question is, do you check them into your SCM system?
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
> >
> > http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
>
> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos

http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/

Reply via email to