Just to be sure, it isn't flexmojos related then, right?

2010/9/27 François Le Droff <[email protected]>

> FYI,
> I just found the missing parameter :
>
> <useResourceBundleMetadata>false</useResourceBundleMetadata>
>
> Cheers,
> François
>
>
> 2010/9/27 François Le Droff <[email protected]>
>
> Hello guys,
>>
>> I'm facing the issue that was discussed in the thread below:
>> My i18ned libraries when built with flex-mojos (3.7) include all the sdk
>> resource-bundles in their catalog.xml.
>> This proves to be an issue for later use in I18N applications.
>> Is there a bug for this one in Jira ?
>> Does any one has a workaround ?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> François
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:35 AM, dtornkaew <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> My SWC doesn't have any of the Flex *.properties files in the /locale/
>>> en_US directory. However if I look at the catalog.xml it does have the
>>> following.
>>>
>>> <script name="en_US$core_properties" mod="1234166223521" >
>>>        <def id="en_US$core_properties" />
>>>        <dep id="AS3" type="n" />
>>>        <dep id="mx.resources:ResourceBundle" type="i" />
>>> </script>
>>> <script name="en_US$logging_properties" mod="1231356741852" >
>>>        <def id="en_US$logging_properties" />
>>>        <dep id="AS3" type="n" />
>>>        <dep id="mx.resources:ResourceBundle" type="i" />
>>> </script>
>>> <script name="en_US$containers_properties" mod="1234166223505" >
>>>        <def id="en_US$containers_properties" />
>>>        <dep id="AS3" type="n" />
>>>        <dep id="mx.resources:ResourceBundle" type="i" />
>>> </script>
>>> <script name="en_US$collections_properties" mod="1234166223505" >
>>>       <def id="en_US$collections_properties" />
>>>       <dep id="AS3" type="n" />
>>>       <dep id="mx.resources:ResourceBundle" type="i" />
>>> </script>
>>>
>>> I didn't paste all of them here but it looks to me like all transient
>>> dependencies that have resource bundles in them are getting compiled
>>> in even though they are marked scope "external".
>>>
>>> Lance
>>>
>>> On Apr 27, 7:18 pm, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > Check your SWC.  It probably contains flex SDK resource bundles..... so
>>> it
>>> > got duplicated and FDK doesn't compile.
>>> > VELO
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 9:09 PM, dtornkaew <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > That was my initial thought too but I double checked all dependencies
>>> > > that I am compiling (using mvn dependency:tree) and they are all on
>>> > > the same version of Flex. One exception is PureMVC but it is also
>>> > > marked as scope "external" on all libraries.
>>> >
>>> > > Something I noticed is when I turn on "keep-generated-code" Flex
>>> > > Compiler is creating classes for all resource bundles that are
>>> > > resolved even bundles that are marked "external". My fear is that
>>> > > these are getting compiled in to all of my libraries and conflicting
>>> > > with each other when they are later used with "include-libraries"
>>> > > which is the case with the unit tests.
>>> >
>>> > > As soon as I get time I will build out some small scale projects and
>>> > > do further testing.
>>> >
>>> > > Thanks for the help and suggestions!
>>> > > Lance
>>> >
>>> > > On Apr 27, 3:26 pm, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > > > This seem to be a problem on your libraries... like something built
>>> with
>>> > > > flex 3.2 mixed with something built using 3.3
>>> >
>>> > > > VELO
>>> >
>>> > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 5:11 PM, dtornkaew <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > > > VELO,
>>> >
>>> > > > > I Put "compile" and "merge" on the library-path and "internal",
>>> > > > > "external", "test", "rsl", "caching", "getDefaultLocale()",
>>> > > > > "runtimeLocales" and "compiledLocales" all on the
>>> include-libraries
>>> > > > > and I get the same problem.
>>> >
>>> > > > > I get the following error on rpc.rb.swc and
>>> datavisualization.rb.swc:
>>> > > > > [ERROR] /home/llinder/.m2/repository/com/adobe/flex/framework/
>>> > > > >
>>> datavisualization/3.3.0.4852/datavisualization-3.3.0.4852-en_US.rb.swc
>>> > > > > $locale/en_US/skins.properties:[16,34] Incompatible override.
>>> > > > > override protected function getContent():Object
>>> >
>>> > > > > I also get this error for each of the standard flex resource
>>> bundles:
>>> > > > > [ERROR]
>>> /home/llinder/gjobs/md/data_tracking/trunk/datatracking-flex-
>>> > > > > project/datatracking-flex-framework/target/datatracking-flex-
>>> > > > >
>>> framework-1.0.1.0-SNAPSHOT.swc(en_US$collections_properties):[-1,-1]
>>> > > > > Incompatible override.
>>> >
>>> > > > > This seems like a bug with Flex Builder but I can't nail down
>>> > > > > specifically what is causing it.
>>> >
>>> > > > > For now I am going back to "internal", "test", "rsl", "caching"
>>> on the
>>> > > > > include-libraries and everything else on library-path :-(
>>> >
>>> > > > > When time permits I will put together a set of sample projects to
>>> > > > > duplicate the issue. In the main time if you or anyone else has
>>> any
>>> > > > > more thoughts I will gladly try them out!
>>> >
>>> > > > > Thanks!
>>> > > > > Lance
>>> >
>>> > > > > On Apr 27, 1:04 pm, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > > > > > Wow, this is a serious issue on flex compiler....
>>> > > > > > I think is possible to workaround it by changing the test to
>>> include
>>> > > all
>>> > > > > > locales available.... but not sure if that is a wise decision.
>>> > > > > > I mean, does some see any problem on including all resource
>>> bundles
>>> > > > > > available into the test SWF?
>>> >
>>> > > > > > VELO
>>> >
>>> > > > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Dtornkaew <[email protected]>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > When compiling multiple SWC libraries AND marking all
>>> dependencies
>>> > > as
>>> > > > > > > scope "external" the unit tests won't compile. The Flex
>>> Compiler
>>> > > error
>>> > > > > > > complains about incompatible overrides on the generated
>>> locale
>>> > > > > > > classes.
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > This problem arises when I create 2 SWC libraries where
>>> library B
>>> > > > > > > depends on library A and both library A and B have locales
>>> and I
>>> > > mark
>>> > > > > > > both libraries with compileLocales property and all
>>> dependencies on
>>> > > > > > > library A and B are marked to scope "external".
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > I have been able to fix the problem by changing
>>> TestCompilerMojo to
>>> > > > > > > put all "external" and "test" dependencies on the
>>> library-path
>>> > > instead
>>> > > > > > > of on the include-path. When I do this everything works fine.
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > I am torn... I know there are problems with the Automation
>>> > > framework
>>> > > > > > > and Unit Tests if all dependencies marked "test" are not on
>>> the
>>> > > > > > > "include-path" but at the same time there are problems with
>>> > > compiling
>>> > > > > > > multiple dependent SWCs with compiled locales. The only way I
>>> can
>>> > > see
>>> > > > > > > to solve this problem is for more scopes such as
>>> "test-internal"
>>> > > and
>>> > > > > > > "test-merged" but this is not my decision to make... just my
>>> > > > > > > problem :'(
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > Anyone have suggestions or run into this problem before?
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > The reason I am using scope "external" for all dependencies
>>> on my
>>> > > > > > > libraries is to attempt to keep my libraries free of
>>> transient
>>> > > code.
>>> >
>>> > > > > > > Thanks,
>>> > > > > > > Lance
>>> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en
>>>
>>> http://blog.flex-mojos.info/
>>> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> François Le Droff
>> http://www.droff.com
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> François Le Droff
> http://www.droff.com
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
>
> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos

http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/

Reply via email to