By the, I was not referring specifically to solving the problem of
4.5.0.17689, but to take the chance to try working closely with Adobe to
see if it's possible to get an official Maven adoption on the SDK.
João Saleiro
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [flex-mojos] Re: Flex SDK 4.5.0.17689
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 20:54:52 +0000
From: João Saleiro <[email protected]>
Organization: Webfuel.pt
To: [email protected]
Marvin, from what I know, Adobe is aware of the importance of Maven, and
I believe it's in their plans to address maven properly.
I know you don't have any direct gain supporting flex-mojos, but you are
right now maybe the most important player on the proper adoption of
Maven for Flex. I advise you to keep close contacts with Deepa (she's
the right person right now to discuss the subject, and she's very
balanced), and if possible tell her *exactly* what Adobe needs to do on
the short term and on the long term. I assure you they will listen and
take you in consideration. I cannot assure they will change their
roadmap right now, but there's a strong possibility that I wouldn't waste.
So, in your spare time, if you can help Adobe helping themselves, you
will be helping all of us - and yourself ;).
IMHO, of course. :)
Thank you for your great work,
João Saleiro
On 10-11-2010 20:07, Marvin Froeder wrote:
Well, Deepa, from adobe, contacted me last night, wanna know why can't
I overlay flex SDK and replubish... mainly:
Idea 2, republish, well, republishing released artifacts cause
problems. This is a maven thing.
Idea 1, nice, but then how to get flexSDK bundle compatible to
flexmojos? What about RSLs, doesn't seem a good way to go.
Both 1 and 2 will give me more work then it should, and as you said
the situation is already depressing. I will enjoy summer over south
hemisphere, after that I will put my mind on the issue at hand.
Hopefully people will change Adobe mind by the time I finish my free
time vacation.
VELO
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Rupert Key <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Yep, I think I speak for the community when I say we:
- empathize with you and the depressing situation,
- very much appreciate your doing all of this work (code, admin
and support),
- appreciate the irony that your free-to-them work is making
their products used more!
- all agree it'd help if Adobe hosted a Maven repo.
Hope your employer recognizes! Please don't give up the good fight!
So, 'nuff of the empathy ;-) What were your thoughts on my other
suggestions?
Thanks, R.
On 10/11/2010 13:41, Marvin Froeder wrote:
I'm honestly evaluating Idea 3:
Let adobe publish flex SDK.... I'm quite full of dealing with that.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Rupert Key
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Thanks for taking the time to respond, Scott!
Velo, could a kludge suffice until Adobe publish?
Idea 1:
Publish with an interim version number after 17689 to allow
Maven to separate it.
Problem: I guess that'd screw the generated RSL paths though
(if one's using
the version info)?
Idea 2:
Re-publish.
Problem: Am I correct in thinking re-publishing with the fix
isn't advisable in
a public repo? (hence your question to Scott)
Last clarifying question: we're OK doing it in our private
repos though if we
accept the [minimal] risk, right? (not sure I know what risks
might be but...!)
Idea n?
Sorry [as always] for the dumb questions. Just looking to
move things forwards
(publicly and internally)
Thanks, R.
On 08/11/2010 19:18, Scott Castle wrote:
> Hi Flex Mojos list,
> The AIR team is in the process of fixing the issue with
Maven and ADT
> now. We will be updating the AIR 2.5 SDK with a repackaged
adt.jar
> that no longer includes the unnecessary jar files from smali/
> backsmali. We currently plan to publish this update to the
web on
> 11/18/2010.
>
> Flex SDK users should be able to update their existing Flex
SDK by
> overlaying the new AIR 2.5.2 SDK over the shipping version.
>
> Regards,
> - Scott Castle
>
> On Nov 7, 6:53 pm, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> I honestly don't expected changes any time soon. Since
this is a released
>> product, but who knows.....
>>
>> I hope to be proven wrong, but one week later I still
right....
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Rupert Key
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> Hi, Scott
>>> May I echo Muji's public thanks for your and Adobe's
attention to this (and
>>> to
>>> Joseph for fixing the integrated JAR quickly, too!). May
I ask whether
>>> there's
>>> any newer update than that posted in the bug, please?
Especially with
>>> Android
>>> capabilities!
>>> Thanks, Rupert.
>>> On 31/10/2010 18:12, Scott Castle wrote:
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>> I am a product manager with the AIR team at Adobe. This
issue has
>>>> been brought to our attention, and our understanding is
that it's
>>>> caused by the inadvertent inclusion of the
jflex-maven-plugin jars in
>>>> smali/backsmali. We're taking steps to correct this
ASAP in the AIR
>>>> SDK, which should resolve the issue identified with the
Flex SDK.
>>>> Regards,
>>>> - Scott
>>>> On Oct 25, 6:35 pm, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>> Before anyone asks, flexmojos do not work with this SDK
release.
>>>>> For some reason adobe decided to embed lots of GPL
bytecode into
>>> ADT.jar,
>>>>> which does break maven classloading.
>>>>> When adobe fixes that people can hope to get flexmojos
working with this
>>> new
>>>>> flex SDK.
>>>>> Sorry folks, completely out of my hand.
>>>>> VELO
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to
the Google
>>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected]
<mailto:flex-mojos%[email protected]><flex-mojos%2bunsubscr...@googlegrou
ps.com <http://ps.com>>
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
>>> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google
Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
To post to this group, send email to
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
<mailto:flex-mojos%[email protected]>
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
<mailto:flex-mojos%[email protected]>
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
