I'm still having some problems.
I exchanged maven for 3.0.1, downloaded tattletale dependency 1.1.1.Final
from Jboss site  and now I'm getting this:

Failed to execute goal
org.sonatype.plugins:tattletale-maven-plugin:1.0:tattletale-dependencies
(default) on project flexmojos-maven-plugin: Execution default of goal
org.sonatype.plugins:tattletale-maven-plugin:1.0:tattletale-dependencies
failed: A required class was missing while executing
org.sonatype.plugins:tattletale-maven-plugin:1.0:tattletale-dependencies:
javassist/NotFoundException


Think that's something from my environment/artifact repository that's wrong,
but can't figure out what.

Any hints of what may be wrong is apprecciated,
Rafael


On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Rafael Adson Barbosa Barros <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks, it solved the compilation problem!
> On Dec 3, 2010 3:09 PM, "Marvin Froeder" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > maven 3.0.1?
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Rafael Adson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Also, on a side note, I am trying to compile the latest version of
> >> flexmojos in my computer (a mac os x) and I'm getting errors:
> >>
> >> org.apache.maven.InternalErrorException: Internal error:
> >> java.lang.ClassCastException:
> >> org.apache.maven.artifact.repository.MavenArtifactRepository cannot be
> >> cast to org.apache.maven.artifact.repository.ArtifactRepository
> >>
> >> Also, it appears that there's some code that references import
> >> org.sonatype.flexmojos.compiler.IApplicationDomains but I couldn't
> >> find this file.
> >>
> >> Just thought you wanted to know.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Rafael
> >>
> >>
> >> On Dec 3, 1:21 pm, Rafael Adson <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> > I was trying to compile an air-application using flexmojos 4
> >> >
> >> > When I ran the dependency tree on the application, the result
> >> > contained the following
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] | +- br.com.p2d.thirdparty.flex:flexlib:swc:1.0:external
> >> > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:airframework:rb.swc:
> >> > 3.5.0.12683:runtime
> >> > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:airframework:swc:
> >> > 3.5.0.12683:external
> >> > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:applicationupdater:swc:
> >> > 3.5.0.12683:runtime
> >> > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:applicationupdater_ui:swc:
> >> > 3.5.0.12683:runtime
> >> > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:flex:swc:3.5.0.12683:external
> >> > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:flex-framework:pom:
> >> > 3.5.0.12683:external (scope managed from runtime)
> >> > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:framework:rb.swc:
> >> > 3.5.0.12683:runtime
> >> > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:framework:swc:
> >> > 3.5.0.12683:external
> >> > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:framework:zip:configs:
> >> > 3.5.0.12683:runtime
> >> > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:playerglobal:swc:
> >> > 9:3.5.0.12683:runtime
> >> > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:rpc:rb.swc:3.5.0.12683:runtime
> >> > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:rpc:swc:3.5.0.12683:external
> >> > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:servicemonitor:swc:
> >> > 3.5.0.12683:runtime
> >> > [INFO] | \- com.adobe.flex.framework:utilities:swc:
> >> > 3.5.0.12683:runtime
> >> > [INFO] +- com.adobe.flex.framework:air-framework:pom:
> >> > 3.5.0.12683:external
> >> > [INFO] \- com.adobe.flex.framework:airglobal:swc:3.5.0.12683:external
> >> >
> >> > When I compiled, in the test-compile goal it gave out the message:
> >> >
> >> > Error: Type was not found or was not a compile-time
> >> constant:NativeWindow.
> >> >
> >> > So I went and debugged flexmojos code. I found out that in the
> >> > TestCompileMojo, there's a method called getExternalLibraryPath(),
> >> > that eventually calls getDependency() on AbstractMavenMojo that in its
> >> > turn calls:
> >> >
> >> > return selectFirst( getDependencies(), allOf( matchers ) );
> >> >
> >> > And the Matcher matchers accepts airglobal.swc and playerglobal.swc.
> >> >
> >> > My question is: is this the expected behaviour? Shouldn't it declare
> >> > airglobal instead since if I'm declaring a dependency to airglobal my
> >> > application is an AIR application, or at least signal an error saying
> >> > that I shouldn't have both playerglobal and airglobal in the
> >> > dependency:tree?
> >> >
> >> > I'm asking this because it gets very confusing. For example, if I
> >> > declare the airglobal as the first dependency on the pom.xml, the
> >> > dependency:tree contains:
> >> > [INFO] +- com.adobe.flex.framework:airglobal:swc:3.5.0.12683:external
> >> > [INFO] | +- br.com.p2d.thirdparty.flex:flexlib:swc:1.0:external
> >> > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:airframework:rb.swc:
> >> > 3.5.0.12683:runtime
> >> > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:airframework:swc:
> >> > 3.5.0.12683:external
> >> > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:applicationupdater:swc:
> >> > 3.5.0.12683:runtime
> >> > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:applicationupdater_ui:swc:
> >> > 3.5.0.12683:runtime
> >> > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:flex:swc:3.5.0.12683:external
> >> > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:flex-framework:pom:
> >> > 3.5.0.12683:external (scope managed from runtime)
> >> > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:framework:rb.swc:
> >> > 3.5.0.12683:runtime
> >> > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:framework:swc:
> >> > 3.5.0.12683:external
> >> > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:framework:zip:configs:
> >> > 3.5.0.12683:runtime
> >> > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:playerglobal:swc:
> >> > 9:3.5.0.12683:runtime
> >> > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:rpc:rb.swc:3.5.0.12683:runtime
> >> > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:rpc:swc:3.5.0.12683:external
> >> > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:servicemonitor:swc:
> >> > 3.5.0.12683:runtime
> >> > [INFO] | \- com.adobe.flex.framework:utilities:swc:
> >> > 3.5.0.12683:runtime
> >> > [INFO] +- com.adobe.flex.framework:air-framework:pom:
> >> > 3.5.0.12683:external
> >> >
> >> > And the compilation works (since selectFirst will now get airglobal
> >> > instead of playerglobal.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for the help,
> >> > Rafael
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> > From: John <[email protected]>
> >> > Date: Aug 20 2009, 3:02 pm
> >> > Subject: Compile error: Type was not found or was not a compile-time
> >> >
> >> > constant:NativeWindow
> >> > To: Flex Mojos
> >> >
> >> > That would be a great news to a lot of users. Look forward to it.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > John
> >> >
> >> > On Aug 20, 12:51 pm, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I will need to customize artifact resolution... flex and current
> maven
> >> > > resolution aren't playing nice together ....
> >> > > Flexmojos needs some custom rules, for instance, if current project
> >> declares
> >> > > air-framework or flex-framework it should ignore air/flex deps from
> >> deps
> >> > > tree.
> >> >
> >> > > VELO
> >> >
> >> > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:44 PM, John <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > > You are right. I will try to exclude that to see if it helps.
> >> >
> >> > > > Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > > > John
> >> >
> >> > > > [INFO] [dependency:tree {execution: default-cli}]
> >> > > > [INFO] com.jtv:simpleProto:swf:1.0-SNAPSHOT
> >> > > > [INFO] +- org.springextensions.actionscript:spring-actionscript-
> >> > > > core:swc:0.8:external
> >> > > > [INFO] | \- com.adobe.flex.framework:playerglobal:swc:
> >> > > > 9-3.2.0.3958:runtime
> >> > > > [INFO] +- org.springextensions.actionscript:spring-actionscript-
> >> > > > puremvc-standard:swc:0.8:compile
> >> > > > [INFO] +- org.puremvc:puremvc-as3-standard:swc:2.0.4:compile
> >> > > > [INFO] +- org.as3commons:as3commons-lang:swc:1.0.0-SNAPSHOT:merged
> >> > > > [INFO] | \- com.adobe.flex.framework:flex-framework:pom:
> >> > > > 3.2.0.3958:runtime
> >> > > > [INFO] | \- com.adobe.flex.framework:playerglobal:swc:
> >> > > > 9:3.2.0.3958:runtime
> >> > > > [INFO] +- org.as3commons:as3commons-logging:swc:1.0.0:merged
> >> > > > [INFO] +- org.as3commons:as3commons-reflect:swc:1.0.0:merged
> >> > > > [INFO] +- com.adobe.flex.framework:air-framework:pom:
> >> > > > 3.3.0.4852:compile
> >> > > > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:airframework:swc:
> >> > > > 3.3.0.4852:compile
> >> > > > [INFO] | +-
> >> com.adobe.flex.framework:airglobal:swc:3.3.0.4852:compile
> >> > > > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:applicationupdater:swc:
> >> > > > 3.3.0.4852:compile
> >> > > > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:applicationupdater_ui:swc:
> >> > > > 3.3.0.4852:compile
> >> > > > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:servicemonitor:swc:
> >> > > > 3.3.0.4852:compile
> >> > > > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:flex:swc:3.2.0.3958:compile
> >> > > > [INFO] | +-
> >> com.adobe.flex.framework:framework:swc:3.2.0.3958:compile
> >> > > > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:rpc:swc:3.2.0.3958:compile
> >> > > > [INFO] | +-
> >> com.adobe.flex.framework:utilities:swc:3.3.0.4852:compile
> >> > > > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:airframework:rb.swc:
> >> > > > 3.3.0.4852:compile
> >> > > > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:rpc:rb.swc:3.2.0.3958:compile
> >> > > > [INFO] | +- com.adobe.flex.framework:framework:rb.swc:
> >> > > > 3.2.0.3958:compile
> >> > > > [INFO] | \- com.adobe.flex.framework:framework:zip:configs:
> >> > > > 3.3.0.4852:compile
> >> > > > [INFO] +- flexlib:flexlib-bin:swc:2.4:compile
> >> > > > [INFO] +- org.sonatype.flexmojos:flexmojos-unittest-support:swc:
> >> > > > 3.2.0:test
> >> > > > [INFO] | +- org.funit:funit:swc:0.50.0245:test
> >> > > > [INFO] | +- com.swirlyvision:swirly-vision:swc:1.0:test
> >> > > > [INFO] | +- net.digitalprimates:fluint:swc:v1:test
> >> > > > [INFO] | +- com.asunit:asunit:swc:20071011:test
> >> > > > [INFO] | \- advancedflex:debugger:swc:0.2alpha2:test
> >> > > > [INFO] \- com.adobe.flexunit:flexunit:swc:4.0-alpha-1.0:test
> (scope
> >> > > > not updated to runtime)
> >> > > > [INFO]
> >> > > >
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >
> >> > > > On Aug 20, 12:20 pm, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > > > Somehow a player global is sneaking into your build....
> >> > > > > mvn dependency:tree
> >> >
> >> > > > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:16 PM, John <[email protected]
> >
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > > > > Yes. I saw two posts, one used flex super pom only and the
> other
> >> used
> >> > > > > > air super pom only. Thus, I tried both ways, but seems got the
> >> same
> >> > > > > > result.
> >> >
> >> > > > > > Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > > > > > John
> >> > > > > > On Aug 20, 12:09 pm, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> > > > > > > I mean, why did you comment air super pom and only let flex
> >> super
> >> > > > pom?
> >> >
> >> > > > > > > VELO
> >> >
> >> > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:04 PM, John <
> >> [email protected]>
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > > > > > > Copied from the following wiki.
> >> >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> https://docs.sonatype.org/display/FLEXMOJOS/Package+AIR+Application
> >> >
> >> > > > > > > > If I remove it, the result is the same.
> >> >
> >> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > > > > > > > John
> >> > > > > > > > On Aug 20, 11:51 am, velo <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > Why is that?
> >> >
> >> > > > > > > > > > <parent>
> >> > > > > > > > > > <groupId>org.sonatype.flexmojos</groupId>
> >> > > > > > > > > > <artifactId>flexmojos-flex-super-pom</artifactId>
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> <!--artifactId>flexmojos-air-super-pom</artifactId-->
> >> > > > > > > > > > <version>3.2.0</version>
> >> > > > > > > > > > </parent>
> >> >
> >> > > > > > > > > VELO
> >>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
> <flex-mojos%[email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
> >
>
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
> >>
> >> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
> >>
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
> >
> > http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos

http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/

Reply via email to