Ian - The archetypes are in bad shape as I too discovered a few months back when I started. There was a branch of flexmojos somewhere with archetype improvements in the works, but I honestly can't recall where it is or who was working on it. Sorry I can't be more helpful.
It would be really nice to have a good "Flash Builder 4" archetype based on Flex 4 rather than a FlexBuilder 3 archetype that uses Flex 3. Dave On Dec 29 2010, 4:19 pm, Ian McLean <[email protected]> wrote: > I dove into flexmojos yesterday. Heres some big issues people will > have when trying to evaluate/adopt. I was able to figure out the non- > obvious but really this would otherwise prevent someone from > considering flexmojos at this point. > > First off the xml on this page (http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/getting- > started.html) doesn't show properly. It only shows the contents of the > nodes so already I'm lost without viewing the source of the page. > > Secondly the application archetype builds a project that doesn't > build. The main mxml document is Flex 3 and the sdk configured in the > pom file is flex 4. Even after changing that the project builds but > then fails on the test examples. > > Also, for checking out the archetypes there is no list of what > versions are available to specify in the following. I'm stuck guessing > what versions may exist based on digging around in the blog. > > -DarchetypeVersion=[flexmojos targeted version] > > Now I wouldn't complain without offering to help, so let me know how I > can. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
