so does this mean that there will be no final 3.8 release unless we
find someone
to maintain 3.x development tree.... ?

  luc


On 5 jan, 14:05, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ok, whatever, but... I did abandoned 3.x development, so I won't do a new
> release for it.....  unless you are volunteer to maintain it....
>
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 6:17 AM, lw <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I know , it's again a new parameter but our project can't move
> > currently to flexmojo4 / maven 3.
> > we tried the "multi" pom approach but this was not working nice with
> > developers IDE and is not really a "clean" solution.
>
> > i understand that once maven 3 / flexmojo 4 are more stable , we will
> > move to flexmojo4 solution. but until then , we
> > stay need to stay on flexmojo 3.
>
> > so for us, this would be a 3.x solution only.
>
> > the code impact is kept to minimal, basically all calls to
> > project.getFinalName() are replace by a call to a new method
> > getSwfFinalname() which will return getFinalName() or the configured
> > swfName. so if not used , the build will be the same as currently.
> > further the artifacts attached to the project have a "bit" longer name
> > to prevent overwriting of files.
>
> >  luc
>
> > On Jan 5, 1:55 am, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Ow dear, one more parameter that may or may not affect the swf output
> > > name....  that is one more thing fixed on flexmojos 4....
>
> > > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Luc Willems <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Hi all
>
> > > > i'm currently working on a patch on Flex-Mojo 3.8 / trunk to allow
> > building
> > > > of release and debug versions of all application and module SWF files
> > > > using a single POM.xml
>
> > > > We are currently testing this in our own application but like to push
> > this
> > > > upstream for inclusion in 3.8 release.
> > > > the patch basic allows a fine control of finalName using a new
> > parameter
> > > > swfName
> > > > which enables us to run the compiler 2 times (1 with and 1 without
> > debug
> > > > active ) and have different output file names for application and
> > module swf
> > > > files.
>
> > > > example  pom :
> > > > <build>
> > > >   <finalName>Studio</finalName>
> > > >   <sourceDirectory>src/main/flex</sourceDirectory>
> > > >   <outputDirectory>target/flex-compiler</outputDirectory>
> > > >   <plugins>
> > > >     <plugin>
> > > >       <groupId>org.sonatype.flexmojos</groupId>
> > > >       <artifactId>flexmojos-maven-plugin</artifactId>
> > > >       <version>3.8-SNAPSHOT</version>
> > > >       <extensions>true</extensions>
> > > >       <configuration>
> > > >         <configurationReport>true</configurationReport>
> > > >         <moduleFiles>
> > > >           <module>com/studio/module/authentication/Login.mxml</module>
> > > >           <module>com/studio/module/select/Select.mxml</module>
> > > >           <module>com/studio/module/external/Hello.mxml</module>
> > > >         </moduleFiles>
> > > >         <storepass/>
> > > >         <optimize>true</optimize>
> > > >         <debug>false</debug>
> > > >       </configuration>
> > > >       *<executions>
> > > >         <execution>
> > > >           <id>flexmojos-compile-debug-execution</id>
> > > >           <phase>compile</phase>
> > > >           <goals>
> > > >             <goal>compile-swf</goal>
> > > >           </goals>
> > > >           <configuration>
> > > >             <configurationReport>false</configurationReport>
> > > >             <swfName>${build.finalName}-debug</swfName>
> > > >             <optimize>false</optimize>
> > > >             <debug>true</debug>
> > > >           </configuration>
> > > >         </execution>
> > > >       </executions>*
> > > >     </plugin>
> > > >   </plugins>
> > > > </build>
>
> > > > the bold part is new and required to run the compiler a second time ,
> > > > producing Studio-debug.swf and related module files...
>
> > > > Marvin  , can we provide a patch based on trunk for review, maybe a
> > small
> > > > demo application to test it first  ?
>
> > > > *Luc Willems*
> > > > Senior Software Engineer
> > > >  *----------------------------------*
> > > >  *LUMA INTERNATIONAL NV*
> > > > Lange Kievitstraat 118-120
> > > > 2018 Antwerpen, Belgium
> > > > P: +32 (0) 3 369 20 11
> > > > F: +32 (0) 3 369 20 01
> > > >www.lumacentral.com
>
> > > >  --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > > Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
> > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
> > <flex-mojos%[email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
>
> > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
>
> > > >http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
>
> >http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos

http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/

Reply via email to