If the workarround didn't worked I have no clue. Em 10/05/2011 18:14, "sachin_rt" <[email protected]> escreveu: > I am working on a flex-mojo build for a multi module, multi > application(within same flex project) product. After couple of days or > work, I ended up with 210 pom files, as there are those many > applications. > > My real problem is RSL, > > Lets say I have "Module1", "Module2" and "Application1". In flex > builder, "Application1" has dependency on "Module1" and "Module2" as > link type : RSL. So, i built "Module1" and "Module2" with flex mojos, > and defined appropriate dependency on pom file of "Application1", > which again builds fine, but when i host it on tomcat and runs > "Application1" it complains that one of the class of "Module1" is not > found. > > I then took Application1.swf which was build from Flex Builder and > replaced under tomcat webapps and it worked like champ. This makes me > think that build of "Module1" and "Module2" are good but "Appliction1" > has some problem. Additional i kept generated classes for from flex > mojo build and found that Modules are compiling all required classes > but somehow scope:RSL in pom file of Application is not working, i > tried scope:caching and scope:external from flexmojos... but no luck > so far... > > My dependencies looks like following: > ================================= > <dependencies> > <dependency> > <groupId>com.alnt.adobe.cairngorm</groupId> > <artifactId>cairngorm</artifactId> > <version>${cairngorm.product.version}</version> > <type>swc</type> > <scope>${linkType.caching}</scope> > </dependency> > <dependency> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> > <artifactId>datavisualization</artifactId> > <version>${flex.datavisualization.version}</version> > <type>swc</type> > <scope>${linkType.caching}</scope> > </dependency> > <dependency> > <groupId>com.alnt.fabric</groupId> > <artifactId>ALNTFabricUIFx</artifactId> > <version>${alnt.product.version}</version> > <type>swc</type> > <scope>${linkType.caching}</scope> > </dependency> > <dependency> > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId> > <artifactId>framework</artifactId> > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > <type>pom</type> > </dependency> > </dependencies> > ======================================= > > I did generate config report file from flex builder and flex mojos and > compared them, I am not seeing any major difference. > > Finally i saw following bug on flex mojo and saw that it is fixed. > What version is it fixed on? I am using flex mojo 3.9 and flex sdk > 3.2.0.3958 > > https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/FLEXMOJOS-243 > > I tried to apply the work around suggested on this bug, and my > dependency is copied above.. > > Any help is greatly appreciated. > > Thanks, > sachin_rt > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos > > http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
