I see. I incorrectly understood from your question that you would drop FlexUnit 4+ alltogether.
We are using 4.1.x and I don't think there is any reason not to upgrade from 4.0 to 4.1. On 13 sep, 19:45, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote: > Support some flexunit 4.1 new functionality. > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Christophe Herreman < > > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Marvin, > > > we're using it and I'm pretty sure many people are too. > > > What is your motivation to drop it and what alternatives do you > > propose? > > > regards, > > Christophe > > > On 13 sep, 19:29, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > I'm thinking on dropping flexunit 4.0 support. > > > > If no objections it will be out for 4.0-RC2, so does anyone use it? > > > > VELO > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected] > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos > > >http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
