Not that it matters to me whether it is or not. The language name is ActionScript and not Flex. Flex is UI framework.
function overloading is supported. Java doesn't have virtual functions too. Java doesn't have multiple inheritance too. So, Java isn't 100 % OO language. Again I am not a language lawyer, and it doesn't really matter if ActionScript is one or not - point is it gets the job done. On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:45 PM, sunnyJain <[email protected]>wrote: > > Hi All, > > I don't agree to the point that flex is 100% OO languege. > > The Support for the point goes as : > 1. No multiple inheritance. > 2. Flex supports E4X > 3. Constructor cannot be made private. > 4. No Virtual functions. > 5. No function overloading > > > > -- ------------------------------- Aditya Kumar Pandey --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex India Community" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex_india?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
