Guys any thoughts on this. Does this mail sounds sensible.
Somebody reply please. Thanks, Veeru On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:41 AM, veeru rahul <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I am facing an implementation issue while transforming a heavy object in to > an object of my requirement. > > Object Structure derived from server side (unexposed API - Third party) is > like below > > Nodes : Array > [0] > -ManagedObjects : Object > -Relationships : Object > - typeHeirarchy (ex:DB::Region) > [1] > [2] > etc > > Individual Structure of MO. > > ManagedObject > -id :String > - attributes:array > > attributes array will have the data to be populated for that particular > type hierarchy. > > Individual Structure of relationships > > Relationships > -type:string > -node : array > > This nodes array will in turn have a ManagedObject and Relationship. Like > this it will go deep. > The relationship between parent object and target is the typeHierachy. > > For the parent the typeHierachy will be like this DB::Region for the target > node inside the parent object will be having a typeHierachy > DB::Region/DB::DC. like this it will go to some extent. > > The above mentioned is for the first object in the top level Nodes array, > so like the first object all the object will have a same kind of depth. > > Some coming to my issue, I want to re-structure this format to a form like > below > > Region : List<RegionClass> (or) Object > [0] > -id > -name > - desc > - dc : List <DC> (or) Object > [0] > -id > -name > -shipAddress > -room : List<Room> (or) Object > [0] > [1] > [2] > [3] > etc > > We can achieve the format by going for a lot of for-loops and if loops till > the depth (I mean for each node). > > But today if I am writing a code by using so many for loops till my depth > but tomorrow client will add one more level in the hierarchy, so i need to > change the code back. > > So I want in a generic way some thing like by using a recursive way, i > tried also but I am not able to persist the objects while recursing. > > Can anybody help me on this? > > Getting bugged because of this for the past two days, hope this is a better > forum to get help to write a better code than normal if and for loops. > > PS: I am having a HashMap.as also.I want to maintain that relationship > between objects so I am going for that datastructure. > > Thanks, > Veeru > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex India Community" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex_india?hl=en.
