[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 06 07:21:47 2004 Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Apparently-To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 84863 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2004 14:21:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 6 Apr 2004 14:21:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO p01mgw01.macromedia.com) (216.104.212.90) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Apr 2004 14:21:38 -0000 Received: from S1001EXM02.macromedia.com ([10.4.48.132]) by p01mgw01.macromedia.com (Switch-3.1.4/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id i36ELPjt008280 for <flexcoders@yahoogroups.com>; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 07:21:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by S1001EXM02.macromedia.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <G3CSTR1S>; Tue, 6 Apr 2004 10:21:25 -0400 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 10:21:18 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 216.104.212.90 From: David Mendels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Future Speed Improvements for Flash Player? X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=1930368
Hi PK, > > Reason I'm asking is that i'm sure lots of companies won't > allow internet access for some of their users but Flex seems > quite ideally suited for Enterprise Applications running on > the Intranet internally (a few of our clients don't allow > users access to the internet but run quite a few web based > intranet apps on internal servers). The Flash Player Deployment features with Flex allow IT to manage the install of the Flash Player from behind the firewall so that they can ensure the right version is on their desktops. This is already a "feature" of the Flex server. See the docs. -David > -----Original Message----- > From: pk_wasp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 12:56 AM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Future Speed Improvements for Flash Player? > > Thats really awesome news to hear :) > > Faster Flash Players + Machines Getting Faster = Less > DHTML/Swing Applets etc hopefully :) > > BTW, Is it possible to get an offline installer for Flash > (ver 7) for Internet Explorer, (I know you can get 1 for Netscape)? > > Reason I'm asking is that i'm sure lots of companies won't > allow internet access for some of their users but Flex seems > quite ideally suited for Enterprise Applications running on > the Intranet internally (a few of our clients don't allow > users access to the internet but run quite a few web based > intranet apps on internal servers). > > thanks > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, David Mendels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > A) A performance optimization whitepaper for Flex is in editing > stages and > > should be up on our site pretty soon (I don't know the exact date > or I would > > be more specific.) > > > > B) Yes, performance improvement is the major focus of the next rev > of the > > Flash Player. > > > > -David > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: pk_wasp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2004 8:13 PM > > > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > > > Subject: [flexcoders] Future Speed Improvements for Flash Player? > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > I'm a J2EE Developer (please don't boo me :) ) looking > into RIA (for > > > Intranet Apps anyway). I'm still waiting for the Trial Flex CD to > > > arrive (can't wait) but 1 think i've notice is that the Flash > > > Movies/Sites/Apps are noticably slower and less > responsive then Java > > > HTML Form Apps/Windows Apps etc even slower then Java Swing Apps. > > > > > > Are there any plans/rumours with for the next Flash > Player to have a > > > performance increase like last time?. I know desktop machines are > > > getting faster but the majority of our clients are still stuck on > > > machines with less then 500Mhz CPUs. > > > > > > Coz FLex supports liquid layout, lots of new controls etc > the only > > > thing stopping me from recommending management to take a serious > > > look @ Flash is the speed e.g Flex Store demo didn't run > too well on > > > 600MHz machines. > > > > > > It'll be good to read up on articles on how to optimise > Flex/Flash > > > for lower end client machines, does any1 know of any? > > > > > > cheers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > >