[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 07 11:55:27 2004 Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Apparently-To: [email protected] Received: (qmail 62606 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2004 18:38:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 7 Apr 2004 18:38:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sccrmhc13.comcast.net) (204.127.202.64) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Apr 2004 18:38:38 -0000 Received: from gnat (c-67-168-211-194.client.comcast.net[67.168.211.194]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with SMTP id <20040407162120016003iphke>; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 16:21:20 +0000 To: <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 09:25:30 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 204.127.202.64 From: "Nat Papovich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: MXML VTM's for Homesite? X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=113000121 X-Yahoo-Profile: MCNattyP
Brian - I have heard on an other forum that Homesite doesn't like the <prefix:tagname> format of MXML, and that it would mean a lot of work to make it work (i.e. not just a matter of VTMLs). I too am interested in this possibility, but we might have to wait for the Eclipse plugin. NAT
