RE: [flexcoders] cairngorm with a business delegate on the app server

[Steven Webster]

Hey Jeff,               Thanks.  Yes the get instance is for a factory, and I would like to not give up the abstraction that this gives me.  That is why I don’t want to remote right to my instance.  I think creating a class on the server, something like flexUserManger, would be my best bet.  In the constructor I will call the getInstance then just implement all the methods using that instance.  I just wanted to make sure I wasn’t missing something in flex.  Since I am comfortable in java I don’t want to run backto java every time I hit an obstacle if flex has a way of handling it.   I think you got it right ... create a FlexUserManager or similar, and RemoteObject onto that.   Good luck,   Steven   -- Steven Webster Technical Director iteration::two   This e-mail and any associated attachments transmitted with it may contain confidential information and must not be copied, or disclosed, or used by anyone other than the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please destroy this e-mail, and any copies ofit, immediately.   Please also note that while software systems havebeen used to try to ensure that this e-mail has been swept for viruses, iteration::two do not accept responsibility for any damage or loss caused in respect of any viruses transmitted by the e-mail. Please ensure your own checks are carried out before any attachments are opened. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.7.1 - Release Date: 09/03/2005