RE: [flexcoders] Submit an editable grid

[Valy Sivec]

Peter,

 

I changed that as you said and it worked fine if  called the method RO.saveIndi( Array )

where the Array is the the data from the dataprovider.

 

The same code doesn't work in case I want to send the dataprovider directly to the remote object ( see the function below )

 

 

This works:

function saveIndi()

{

var gridLines:Array = new Array();

for( var cnt:Number = 0 ; cnt< resultSearchDataGrid.dataProvider.length ; cnt++)

{

var individual: Individual = new Individual();

individual.indi_first_name= resultSearchDataGrid.dataProvider[cnt].indi_first_name;

individual.indi_last_name= resultSearchDataGrid.dataProvider[cnt].indi_last_name;

gridLines[cnt] = individual;

}

oscAppRO.saveIndi( gridLines );

}

 

This doesn't work:

function saveIndi()

{

    oscAppRO.saveIndi(  resultSearchDataGrid.dataProvider );

 }

 

My question is: Is it a bad practice to send as input parameter to the remote object the data provider? or should I transfer the data provider into an array of value objects first?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you,

Valy

 

 

 

Peter Farland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Have you tried changing your Java API to:

 

    public void saveIndi(Individual[] individuals)

 

instead?

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Valy Sivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 12:09 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Submit an editable grid

Peter,

 

Thank you for your message. I fixed the problem and what I have done is to iterate the datagrid provider  and dump it into an array of AS2 value objects.  and call the remote object like :

function saveDataGrid()

{

var gridLines:Array = new Array();

for( var cnt:Number = 0 ; cnt< resultSearchDataGrid.dataProvider.length ; cnt++)

{

var individual: Individual = new Individual();

individual.indi_first_name= resultSearchDataGrid.dataProvider[cnt].indi_first_name;

individual.indi_last_name= resultSearchDataGrid.dataProvider[cnt].indi_last_name;

individual.indi_dob_long = resultSearchDataGrid.dataProvider[cnt].indi_dob_long;

individual.asset_values = resultSearchDataGrid.dataProvider[cnt].asset_values;

gridLines[cnt] = individual;

}

oscRO.saveIndi( gridLines );

}

The server side method is   public void saveIndi( Object[] list);

 

Is this redundant? 

Thanks,

Valy

 

 

Peter Farland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

What does the API for the "save" method on the RemoteObject service look like?  If it is based on something generic, like java.util.Map, then it might leave a type as flashgateway.io.ASObject (which extends java.util.HashMap). If it's ArrayList, then it might not spot that it needs to make a conversion either. Try changing the API to an Array of YourValueObjectType....

 

        public boolean save(YourValueObjectType[] updates);

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Valy Sivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 9:15 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Submit an editable grid

Hello guys,

 

I have an editable datagrid and a save button underneath. Each row from the datagrid is an "AS2" value object that is registered Object.registerClass. I edit the grid and hit the save button. I would expect to get on the server side an array of  java value objects ( server side relative of the  AS2 objects ) but I get an array of "flashgateway.io.ASObject". Is something am I missing?  or is the right way it should be?

 

Thanks,

Valy

---

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!

---

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!

---

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.