Couldn't you just get to the parent, which is the ViewStack, of those
children from within those children instead of passing the parent into each
of them? I'm not sure if your approach is adding up to the performance
issues that you're experiencing.

-----Original Message-----
From: Krzysztof Szlapinski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 10:01 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] ViewStack beheviour



Yeah, these components have functions that handle this "vs" and its
children.
btw
creationPolicy set to "all" made the problem go away but unfortunately all
the controls which were invisible became visible :( is it normal behaviour
that creationPolicy = "all" makes all controls visible even if they have
visible property set to "false"?

krzysiek


>
> One more thing that I noticed is that you're passing "vs" to every 
> child of the stack? That might also be the cause. Any reason behind 
> that?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 8:24 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [flexcoders] ViewStack beheviour
>
>
>
>>
>> The nextButton navigates to the next viewstack element. My problem is 
>> that each component is displayed very slowly.
>> It takes about 5 sec. to generate about 20 objects in each component.
>>
>> How can I reduce this time?
>>
>
> Do a search for creationPolicy in the livedocs; you should be able to 
> defer or queue the instantiation of your non-visible views in the 
> ViewStack, and spread the performance hit over time.
>
> Steven
>
> --
> Steven Webster
> Technical Director
> iteration::two
>
> This e-mail and any associated attachments transmitted with it may 
> contain confidential information and must not be copied, or disclosed, 
> or used by anyone other than the intended recipient(s). If you are not 
> the intended
> recipient(s) please destroy this e-mail, and any copies of it, 
> immediately.
>
> Please also note that while software systems have been used to try to 
> ensure that this e-mail has been swept for viruses, iteration::two do 
> not accept responsibility for any damage or loss caused in respect of 
> any viruses transmitted by the e-mail. Please ensure your own checks 
> are carried out before any attachments are opened.
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.7.3 - Release Date: 15/03/2005
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----
> This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the 
> sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution 
> or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the 
> intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), 
> please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this
message.
>
> To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Littler Mendelson, P.C.
> http://www.littler.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 





Yahoo! Groups Links








----
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of 
the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by 
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or 
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply 
email and delete all copies of this message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Littler Mendelson, P.C.
http://www.littler.com





Reply via email to