Can you show how youare calling them, or isolate the code that causes the same prob is a separate app and post it here so we can take a look?
 
Jimmy Gianninas
Software Developer - Optimal Payments Inc.
 


From: Rich Tretola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 2:01 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Multiple Remote Objects

Any ideas Steven ?


On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:32:50 -0500, Rich Tretola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The 2nd object never loads.  Here is the code as it is now:
>         <mx:RemoteObject id="salesRepDelegate"
>                                          result="event.call.resultHandler( event.result )"
>                                          fault="mx.core.Application.alert( event.fault.faultstring )"
>                          named="salesRepDelegate"
>                          showBusyCursor="true"
>                          concurrency="multiple"
>                          type="stateless-class">
>         </mx:RemoteObject>
>         <mx:RemoteObject id="expeditedDelegate"
>                                          result="event.call.resultHandler( event.result )"
>                                          fault="mx.core.Application.alert( event.fault.faultstring )"
>                          named="expeditedDelegate"
>                          showBusyCursor="true"
>                          concurrency="multiple"
>                          type="stateless-class">
>         </mx:RemoteObject>
>
> With the above code salesRepDelegate will load but if I reverse the
> order, then only expeditedDelegate will load.
>
> Rich
>
>
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:16:01 -0000, Steven Webster
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Is there a problem with having 2 remote object tags ?  In my
> > > testing, only the 1st remote object is getting loaded.  Any ideas ?
> >
> > You can declare as many as you like, with different ids.
> >
> > What is your source ?  How does the error manifest itself (at
> > compile time, run-time, what is the error message you get, etc)
> >
> > Steven
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to