On Mar 31, 2005 10:30 PM, Darron J. Schall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * The internals are abstracted away. Right now your Lazslo code
> publishes to .swf, but it's not tied to the Flash Player in any way -
> there are no MovieClip references, etc in your lazslo code.
There are no MovieClip references in your Flex code either. It's all
UIObject. I just grepped over my literally hundreds of MXML and
ActionScript source files and didn't find a single MovieClip
reference.
> The fact that Lazslo separates itself from the Flash Player is another
> benefit as well.. If something should ever happen, maybe legal issues
> or whatever, Lazslo can output to, say, Java applets or whatever, since
> the code is all abstracted from the VM and the compilation process
> handles the dirty work of putting your code into a format the VM can
> understand.
Ditto for Flex.
1) You don't write Flash code in Flex.
2) In theory, it's possible to output Flex (MXML/ActionScript) to a
different output format.
Manish
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
