aye thought it was something along those lines (heh never really bothered to try out the FLEX + CENTRAL - yet.
So that being said, surely ZInc is now allowable? i mean the two share if not very close to one another in terms of delivering FLEX swf...so if thats against EULA ...i'd like to see that test case put to a jury heheh. On 4/13/05, peter blazejewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Scott, > > it sounds similar to Flex/Central integration: > Flex application is hosted within Central shell and as source file > during installation: > [quote] > <application name="SomeApp" > src="SomeApp.mxml.swf" > .... > [/quote] > (from example product.xml) > > regards, > peter > > Peter Blazejewicz > > Scott Barnes wrote: > > >Ok, Say you build a SWF thats got a few API classes in there that > >interface to ZInc's FSCOMMAND level ones. > > > >Then using a loadMovie() approach you bring in an external swf - that > >being your flex server...aka myurl.com/app/blah.mxml.swf > > > >Inside that swf, it can excute commands within its parent container > >(ie swf inside the zinc luv). > > > >To me that should be fine as thats like saying you can't use a browser > >to run your flex apps. Furthermore it would then mean MM have to > >release an "approved" browser list as what classifies as an agent for > >FLEX based mxml/swf files? > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > -- Regards, Scott Barnes http://www.mossyblog.com http://www.flexcoder.com (Coming Soon) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
