RE: [flexcoders] Cairngorm flex/AS2 framework naming convention

Thu, 14 Apr 2005 12:00:42 -0700

Hi Valy,
 
From the 0.99 release, the framework will have non-iteration::two package structure.
 
Cheers,
 
Ali
 
--
Alistair McLeod
Development Director
iteration::two
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Office:  +44 (0)131 338 6108
 
This e-mail and any associated attachments transmitted with it may contain confidential information and must not be copied, or disclosed, or used by anyone other than the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please destroy this e-mail, and any copies of it, immediately.
 
Please also note that while software systems have been used to try to ensure that this e-mail has been swept for viruses, iteration::two do not accept responsibility for any damage or loss caused in respect of any viruses transmitted by the e-mail. Please ensure your own checks are carried out before any attachments are opened.
 
 

From: Valy Sivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 April 2005 15:59
To: [email protected]
Subject: [flexcoders] Cairngorm flex/AS2 framework naming convention

Hello,

My undertanding is that this framework is free and was initiated by the guys from "iteration::two", and we all are gratefull for their kindness to share with us this framework. Although, I have a question about it...

Why should the packages have been named using the company name? Shouldn't be nicer to have a neutral naming convention instead?.I know that it isn't a big thing and all of them can be easily renamed.... or maybe this will be part of the next release...

Thanks Valy

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
Yahoo! Groups Links

Reply via email to