Hi Agha,
Thanks for your response... With your help I found that "event.call.methodName" gives the method name that was invoked in the execute method of command. I see the command to be closer to the UI. So I am thinking of doing everything in response to a user action from within a single command, otherwise I will have to invoke these different commands from the UI. I have designed my delgate methods at a more granular level for the sake of modularity and reuse from different commands. What do you think? Regards, Rohit Chhabra. --- In [email protected], "Mehdi, Agha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rohit, > > Q1: I haven't tried it because I never had to but I think that when the > results come back from delegate in the event object, the object also has a > property called method or operation. You can loop over the event object to > see what properties it has. If there's a property holding the method name, > you're good to go. If not then you'd need to execute the methods > synchronously and have a flag inside the command that is set to whatever > method you're going to call. In your onResult, you can than check for that > flag and execute the next method. > > I'd rather create separate commands to execute each delegate's method as > opposed to using one command do all. That will help with chaining commands > easily until we have Cairngorm 0.99. > > Please let me know if you have any questions. > > Thanks > > Agha > > -----Original Message----- > From: flexcoding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 8:41 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Cairngorm question > > > > Hi Gurus, > > Any response to the following questions about Cairngorm? Posting it again in > the forum because the original is burried deep inside. > Thanks for the help in advance... > > Hello Guys, > > I just started Flex development two months back and we are trying to develop > an enterprise level application. So we decided to use open source Cairngorm > Framework v 0.9 by Iteration Two. Though it lacks ample documentation, we > straightway found its benefits as it neatly separates and organizes the > mxml/action script code. Kudos to the developers of this great framework. We > found this to be very benefitial for a big size application. > > I have two questions releted to the Cairngorm framework for rich internet > apps: > > Question 1. If we need to execute multiple delegate methods in response to > one user action, should we write a command action script for each of the > methods? Or can we just have one command corresponding to each user action > and invoke more than one delegate method in the execute method of this > single command? If we can do the latter, is there a way to know in the > onResult method that the respons is coming from which delegate method's > execution and take appropriate action? > > Question 2. In the Java business classes, we return POJOs. Do they need to > be converted to MXML Value Objects? We tried to directly pass these pojos to > the view helpers do display them in the application and it seems to work > perfectly. Are we doing something wrong or can there be any design problems > in doing that which I am not realizing at the moment? > > Thanks & Regards, > > Rohit Chhabra. > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > ---- > This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. > > To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Littler Mendelson, P.C. > http://www.littler.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
