Performance wise, which is betterer? JBOSS Tomcat JRUN4
:) Or is it like comparing a dirtbike against a roadbike? :) On 5/12/05, Cliff Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's exactly the point I was making :) Flex is NOT cheap... > significantly more expensive that CF7 Enterprise... so I can't > understand why Macromedia wouldn't throw in JRun4 with Flex if they're > going to throw it in for CF7 ENT. FYI, JBoss also seems to work > nicely for CFMX7 and Flex 1.5 if you're looking for a "free" J2EE > server to run CF and Flex. :) > > -Cliff > > > On 5/12/05, Scott Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For now we are going to use TomCat to tide us over until we figure > > things out... you'd think for the bucks we paid, JRUN full license > > would of been thrown in ;) hehe. > > > > > > On 5/12/05, Matt Chotin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Er, I don't think the JRun license is a full license with Flex, it's just > > > a > > > trial license. > > > > > > > > > > > > Scott, I'd just talk to your sales rep and see what makes sense for your > > > needs. I have no idea how the pricing works on JRun vs. CF Enterprise. > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > > Behalf Of Scott Barnes > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 9:32 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: [flexcoders] FLEX and CF7.. > > > > > > > > > > > > well the actual legal (Commercial) FLEX license is being sent > > > (currently FEDEX) but i have the serial, and simply used the > > > downloadable version to install. > > > > > > that being said, once i provide the serial it doesn't ask how i want > > > it installed, but simply installs the WAR? > > > > > > am i missing something from this equation? > > > > > > On 5/12/05, Cliff Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > If you purchase a Flex license it comes with a full license of JRun. > > > > When you run the Flex installer you can either have it create a .war > > > > file to deploy to an existing J2EE server, or choose to install JRun4 > > > > on your server and then put Flex on top of it. The same is true of > > > > ColdFusion MX7: if you spring for an Enterprise license you can > > > > install CF with a full version of JRun4, or as a .war to deploy to any > > > > other J2EE server. You could also install CFMX7 in Standalone mode, > > > > but IMHO this would be waste since you'd be sacrificing the full J2EE > > > > capability (Servlets, JSPs, EJBs, etc) as well as some other features > > > > in CFMX7 Enterprise Edition. If you want to deploy CFMX7 and Flex on > > > > top of the same J2EE server (be it the "free" JRun you get with the > > > > CF/Flex licenses or any other J2EE server) you're still going to need > > > > the CFMX7 Enterprise edition. > > > > > > > > If you are looking for the most cost-effective route, you can do the > > > following: > > > > > > > > (1) Buy a Flex license and install it on a box with the full version > > > > > > > of JRun that's included, > > > > (2) Buy a CFMX7 Standard license and install it on a different box in > > > > Standalone mode > > > > > > > > You might also be able to run them side by side on the same box, but > > > > usually I think MM will discourage that behavior since having two JRun > > > > servers on the same box will probably cause issues. Port conflicts > > > > immediately jump to mind since different parts of the J2EE machinery > > > > will probably try to bind to the same default ports, although you > > > > could probaby adjust the .xml config files to resolve this. However > > > > you're also going to add a lot more overhead to your hardware by > > > > running two separate J2EE servers on the same box. If your company is > > > > willing to spring for the hefty price tag of Flex, is the difference > > > > between CFMX7 Standard and Enterprise really that significant? > > > > > > > > HTH, > > > > > > > > Cliff > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/11/05, Scott Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > In order to install FLEX you need an existing Java Application > > > Server, > > > > > now we own CF7 Standard not Enterprise. > > > > > > > > > > 1) Would it be more cost effective to buy JRUN 4 (standalone) and > > > > > deploy CF7/FLEX war files to JRUN4 > > > > > > > > > > 2) Buy / Updared CF7 Standard to Enterpise and deploy FLEX via this > > > route. > > > > > > > > > > I'm not really up to speed on whats what in terms of Java Application > > > > > Server(s) but need to have a setup where i can hopefully have FLEX/CF > > > > > running under the one port (was going to use a CFIMPORT capability > > > but > > > > > CF7 Standard has a software license restriction on JSP apparently). > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Scott Barnes > > > > > http://www.mossyblog.com > > > > > http://www.flexcoder.com (Coming Soon) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > Scott Barnes > > > http://www.mossyblog.com > > > http://www.flexcoder.com (Coming Soon) > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > To visit your group on the web, go to: > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Scott Barnes > > http://www.mossyblog.com > > http://www.flexcoder.com (Coming Soon) > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > -- Regards, Scott Barnes http://www.mossyblog.com http://www.flexcoder.com (Coming Soon) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
