RE: [flexcoders] Flex and Load Balancing

[Matt Chotin]

RemoteObject uses HTTP and should work fine in a load-balanced environment.  The other services (HTTPService and WebService) also do their work over HTTP.  Do you anticipate needing stateful Java classes or will everything work in a stateless environment?  The only thing I can imagine is if somehow the Radware balancers require url-rewriting or some mechanism for supporting sticky sessions that we wouldn’t automatically support, but I tend to think we’d be fine.  Don’t have anything official for you though or actual experience with Radware.   Matt   From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leif Wells Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 10:34 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Flex and Load Balancing   We'd like to use Flex in an enterprise deployment, where all HTTP requests are handled and dispatched by a Radware load balancer. We are getting a bit of push-back from our client. Our client has seen in the past that the Radware load balancers don't work exactly as expected when tunnelling other protocols over HTTP ( e.g. Java RMI).  We want to make sure that the Radware load balancers can handle Flex invocations over HTTP without any problems. These guys need pertinent information to relieve risk-based stress. ;-) Do any of you have any data that indicates that Radware load balancers are fully compatible with Flex remoting? Special thanks, Leif a.k.a., JesterXL's manager   Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.