There's been a long thread about the MXML representation of this.
But I want to point out that, in ActionScript, all those pushes are
inefficient. You should just write
var type_array:Array =
[
{ label: "d4", data: 4 },
{ label: "d6", data: 6 },
...
];
- Gordon
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of JesterXL
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 12:44 PM
To: Flexcoders
Subject: [flexcoders] AS Array vs. MXML Array
How do you get fine grained control in MXML arrays? Like, how do I
represent this in MXML?
var type_array:Array = [];
type_array.push({label: "d4", data: 4});
type_array.push({label: "d6", data: 6});
type_array.push({label: "d8", data: 8});
type_array.push({label: "d10", data: 10});
type_array.push({label: "d100", data: 100});
type_array.push({label: "d12", data: 12});
type_array.push({label: "d20", data: 20});
I tried:
<mx:Array>
<mx:Object>
<mx:String>d4</mx:String>
<mx:Number>4</mx:Number>
</mx:Object>
</mx:Array>
And nested that in a dataProvider nested in a ComboBox. That fails for
my
cellRenderer, however, because he expects a label and data property
name.
Since you can't get nested tags attributes, must I use code for such
models?
--JesterXL
Yahoo! Groups Links
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
