The shared code module won't require any getters. It is effective an RSL that goes in the main app so all modules can use it w/o any changes.
________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of donald_d_hook Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 6:37 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Type Cast Error Alex - So I should define the class in one spot - i.e. the shared code mxml, then use some getters defined in the main app to use that instance or definition in the module. Thanks again for your assistance!! --- In [email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , "Alex Harui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Essentially, the actuall classname isn't StockVO, it is > [EMAIL PROTECTED] If the portion > after the @ matches it is effectively stripped off so you can just see > and use StockVO in most places > > > > So it doesn't really match. This will be extremely useful in Flex 3.2 > when you can mix sub-application built with different versions of Flex, > but is a pain for module users like yourself. > > > > Of course, the easiest way to use StockVO in both modules is to get it > linked into the main app. Most VOs are small so it won't matter. The > SharedCode Module pattern is for heavy things. > > > > ________________________________ > > From: [email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> ] On > Behalf Of donald_d_hook > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 5:52 PM > To: [email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Type Cast Error > > > > Alex - > > I looked at your presentation. I am using the StockVO in both pages > (both modules). I need to use it in both. If I define the class in > both places, what does it matter, its the same class? > > I saw where you mentioned having common code by loading a "Shared > Code" swf that would apply to ALL modules. I guess I can give that a > shot. > > Thanks again for your time! > > --- In [email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > , "Alex Harui" <aharui@> wrote: > > > > It is picking up the class from a different application domain. See > the > > modules presentation on my blog. > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: [email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > ] On > > Behalf Of donald_d_hook > > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 10:22 AM > > To: [email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > > Subject: [flexcoders] Type Cast Error > > > > > > > > I receive a type cast error when I try to cast an object I received > > from the server (an arraycollection of value objects). I get the > > following: > > > > TypeError: Error #1034: Type Coercion failed: cannot convert > > com.spinnaker.model::[EMAIL PROTECTED] to com.spinnaker.model.StockVO > > > > The actionscript object has the correct remoteClass. On top of that, > > this only happens the 2nd time into the page. Not sure what is > > happening behind the scenes, nor do I know what the @3b392b81 is. > > > > Thanks in advance > > >
