Hardly secure considering they can just determine what the value should be and pass you that. If they're going to the trouble to do manual calls like that, I wouldn't put them also being far off grabbing that correct CRC. Hasn't anyone learnt from how much the q3cdkey and ea-f1c checks failed with this same kind of checking? :) Tim Rowe Software Engineer carsales.com Ltd
________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Sent: Thursday, 7 August 2008 3:50 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [flexcoders] CRC That's what I was doing, however I can't ensure that someone is attaching to my remote component with their own function then. I was hoping to catch a value off of a crc check and use that as verification to the remote object that it's really my code that's touching the CF side. ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan Gravener Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 10:38 AM To: [email protected] Subject: {Disarmed} Re: [flexcoders] CRC I just keep a string of the version they are using, then compare that with the server's version. If they don't match, make them run the updater (air). On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: Does anyone know of a way to collect a CRC from a flex or air application file? I would like to verify that they are running the most current version and the code I wrote as they hit my remote components. Thanks Scott -- Ryan Gravener http://twitter.com/ryangravener <http://twitter.com/ryangravener> -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is believed to be clean.
