Now that everyone is back to work, I was hoping someone could help 
with the main problem, of not being able to preview reports with a 
PageFormat of LETTER. I have changed PagFormat, and the Width & 
Height of the template and the previewer just displays horizontially 
smeared documents.

I have posted a bug report to GoogleCode, Written in the FlexReport 
Blog and it seems like no one is listening.

Any help would be appreciated.

Paul

--- In [email protected], "aceoohay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If anyone can point me in the right direction I would appreciate 
it. 
> I am having a bit of a time understanding how flexreports works, 
so 
> trying to debug it is somewhat problematic.
> 
> It appears to convert verything to bitmap, but beyond that I am 
lost.
> 
> All help is appreciated.
> 
> Paul
> 
> --- In [email protected], "aceoohay" <pauls@> wrote:
> >
> > FlexReport developers, I have a few questions, The following 
> relates 
> > to the current SVN version;
> > 
> > 1) When I set the PaperFormat to LETTER and adjust my template 
to 
> > width="792" height="1224" the image in the previewer and PDF are 
> > smeared so much that everything appears as gray horizontal 
streaks. 
> > However when I print it comes out ok. What am I doing wrong?
> > 
> > 2) I need to insert page breaks either in the data stream (HTML) 
or 
> > as part of the "PrintTextArea" tag. In the HTML would be best. 
Is 
> > there current functionality to do this? How?
> > 
> > 3) I am developing a mini word processor for my application to 
> allow 
> > the generation of simple letters with a mail merge from a 
database. 
> I 
> > am using the mx:RichTextEditor which has lots of functionality 
> > including a number of fonts. It seems as though the only way to 
> print 
> > different fonts from FlexReports is to add embedded fonts. If I 
> need 
> > 1o fonts and their associated bold and italic versions, this 
would 
> > seem to substantially increase the swf size. Is their a way of 
> > avoiding this?
> > 
> > I have posted some of this to the blog, but it doesn't seem too 
> > active.
> > 
> > Paul
> >
>


Reply via email to