Adobe should dust off XRes...that was pretty similar tech from what I
recall. With broadband being so common these days there'd probably be
a renewed interest in this sort of capability.
On 15/08/2008, at 2:37 PM, Scott Barnes wrote:
Actually not true, it's the client-side that does the actual real
work. The server-side is simply a way of ensuring asset performance
is in check (ie if we put a 1gb file on your run time, imagine what
that impact would have) making them seamlessly zoom in a manner
that's fluid as opposed to Lee's example are separate things all
together. In Lee's example it still stutters and you loose not only
fidelity but should you wish to have a 1gb photo, it's unable to
adhere to the same performance around HD images.
Deep Zoom uses our SeaDragon technology.
HTH.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:06 AM, Josh McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
It's not the client-size zoom that contains the pixie dust, it's the
badass streaming image server required to support it.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 4:50 PM, slash_n_rose
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All
Is there any flex component like a Silverlight Deep Zoom?
Regards
Jerry
--
"Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It tolls for
thee."
:: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald
:: 0437 221 380 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Regards,
Scott Barnes
Rich Client Platform Manager
Microsoft.
http://blogs.msdn.com/msmossyblog
