i do think you should wrap your responder in another object, the advantage
of this is that you can place your fault handler and data handler in the
same place, but it does depend on your architecture.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Richard Rodseth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Good idea. Thanks.
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Johannes Nel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> you can hack around it by pointing the the callback function to your
>> unit test class and dispatching an event from there.
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Richard Rodseth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>>
>>> As I mentioned, the service (delegate) method I am calling has an
>>> IResponder callback - it doesn't dispatch events.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Ralf Bokelberg <
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Say you are waiting for an object myDispatcher to dispatch an event
>>>> myEvent.
>>>> Then you call myDispatcher.addEventListener("myEvent", addAsync(
>>>> handleSuccess, 1000 ));
>>>> Inside handleSuccess you can assert as usually. If handleSuccess is
>>>> not called within 1000 ms, the test fails.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Ralf.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> j:pn
>> \\no comment
>>
>
>
>
--
j:pn
\\no comment
