Interesting, what name did you use for the look up? How was the class set up? It doesn't surprise me though.
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Josh McDonald Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 10:43 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Quick question about Mixins and internal class scope I was just hoping it was something that'd been tried and there's be an answer. The answer for anybody following this however, is that getDefinitionByName() returns null, and you NPE inside SystemManager :) -Josh On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Alex Harui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: In case you were hoping I had the answer, I don't. Should be a 10 minute experiment though. However, an internal class can certainly be handed the SM by the first [mixin] that uses it From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Josh McDonald Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 5:43 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [flexcoders] Quick question about Mixins and internal class scope Hey guys, I'm miles from compiling and testing what I'm writing at the moment, so I thought I'd just ask in case somebody knows- will getDefinitionByName("foo") fail on an "internal" class when SystemManager is trying to call init() on the mixins? I have a class I'd like to make internal, but it needs to be a mixin as well in order to get a reference to SystemManager ASAP. Cheers, -Josh -- "Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It tolls for thee." :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald :: 0437 221 380 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- "Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It tolls for thee." :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald :: 0437 221 380 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
