----- Original Message ----- 
From: "nathanpdaniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 3:29 PM
Subject: [flexcoders] Who is Robert Thompson?


> Since he seems to be in EVERY thread... and why should we (not) listen
> to what he has to say?  Just curious...

I have no idea who he is. He says some sensible things, he has some 
controversial views and he seems to have a mission to push his view of the 
world onto the flexcoders community at every opportunity.

I don't have a problem with anyone putting forward a viewpoint or mentioning 
some flex related development, but it gets tedious when it's done post after 
post. A lot of what Robert has said has been mentioned here before so it's 
not some great insight that we're seeing on some new feature of flex 
development or software business practices.

Robert clearly has a view of the world that is all his own. It's OK to put 
that forward once, but in post after post aspects of that view are pushed 
forward. I feel like I'm reading propoganda broadcasts. I don't have an 
issue with the technologies that Robert champions - many developers here 
(including me) have used papervision, dabbled with lazlo or have used FDT 
and many developers here have talked about their use in conjunction with 
Flex. I have no problem with devlopers that use other technologies - many of 
us use multiple technologies as a matter of course.

Robert is unhappy with some of Adobe's business practices and has declared 
his intention to look elesewhere away from flex towards other technologies. 
That's his prerogative, but I don't feel he should use absolutely every 
opportunity to push his alternative technologies as though he has a mission 
to move us from the evil flex into the light.

I just don't like having one persons views pushed at me post after post. 
This list is about flex, but lately it's mostly about the world according to 
RT.

Don't get me wrong. RT is entitled to have his views, but I shouldn't have 
to keep reading about them all of the time. 

Reply via email to