I'll test that theory out when I have time. For now I have a workaround. It'll be interesting to see if there's a substantive difference between the two.
- Daniel Freiman On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Alex Harui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I use FDB to debug XML problems. I can see instance numbers and other > properties that the FB debugger filters. I don't trust the debugger to step > into binding code. > > > > *From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On > Behalf Of *Daniel Freiman > *Sent:* Monday, September 15, 2008 1:59 PM > *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] XMLListCollection.AddItemAt() silently fails > > > > Yeah, I've been looking into binding causes, but wouldn't I see that > happening while stepping through the code? As far as I can tell this is an > atomic action (or lack thereof). > > - Daniel Freiman > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Alex Harui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Maybe setting source[0] triggers change events that refresh source? > > > > *From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On > Behalf Of *Daniel Freiman > *Sent:* Monday, September 15, 2008 12:03 PM > *To:* flexcoders > *Subject:* [flexcoders] XMLListCollection.AddItemAt() silently fails > > > > I have a case where I try to add a node to an empty XMLListCollection and > addition silently fails. I step through the code and I find that line 216 > of XMLListAdapater is the line that is failing (it's supposed to assign the > added node to the first location in the source list but instead nothing > happens). Here's the line: > > source[0] = length > 0 ? item + source[0] : item; > > I can't recreate this bug in any other condition other than the app I'm > currently developing. Has anyone else seen this intermitent error? > > - Daniel Freiman > > > > >
