Thanks Mike, but that's really what I was trying to avoid. That's the same
as my example, only the function is anonymous instead. I thought maybe
there was some way to get Flex to realize I wanted the setter function, not
the "property."
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Michael Schmalle
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi,
> This works, I tested it;
>
> callLater(function (stack:ViewStack, container:Container):void {
> stack.selectedChild = container;
> }, [viewStack, someBox]);
>
>
> Mike
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Pan Troglodytes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> Is there some way to use callLater to set a property that has a
>> setter? So far, all I can think of is to create a dummy function that does
>> the setting and pass it in the callLater:
>>
>> private function setSelectedChild(viewStack:ViewStack,
>> newChild:Container):void
>> {
>> viewStack.selectedChild = newChild;
>> }
>>
>> ...
>>
>> callLater(setSelectedChild, [someBox]);
>>
>>
>> Any better way to do it?
>>
>> --
>> Jason
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Teoti Graphix, LLC
> http://www.teotigraphix.com
>
> Teoti Graphix Blog
> http://www.blog.teotigraphix.com
>
> You can find more by solving the problem then by 'asking the question'.
>
>
--
Jason
