Jack,

You compile the SWF on a server with Flex install. Then copy the generated
SWF over to your web server and embed it in a web page.

The difference is that you don't need a Java Application Server running.
i.e. more system resources

I'm not positive, but I think you need special licensing permission from MM
to deploy a Flex app without the server.

Regards,
Rob Rusher

Macromedia Certified Flex Instructor
e:[EMAIL PROTECTED] c:303.885.7044 im:robrusher

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of jwc_wensan
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 1:59 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex License(s) & Performance

Darron:

Thanks for your input.

I read Ted's post. His production server does not have Flex.  Where
is the SWF being served from?

Forgive my ignorance, but if you need a flex license for every server
the SWF sits on, what's the difference?

Can you elaborate further?

Thanks again,

Jack

--- In [email protected], "Darron J. Schall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> jwc_wensan wrote:
> 
> >With the above scenario how many simultaneous users can adequately
> >access the server before I would need a second server?  Or is it
> >better to ask how many per hour?
> >  
> >
> See Ted's entry here about scaling Flex:  
> http://www.powersdk.com/ted/2005/05/scaling-flex.php
> 
> I completely agree with him as well.  I don't have Flex running on 
the 
> server at all.  Instead, I take my Flex-compiled .swf and place it 
on a 
> "typical" web server.  Then, the Flex application is delivered as 
a .swf 
> and there's no need for the server to do any extra processing at 
all.  
> I've never had a server crash because it couldn't send out .swf 
files 
> fast enough.  Keep in mind though, you'll need a Flex license for 
every 
> server the .swf file sits on.
> 
> You can use RemoteObjects without a Flex server running as well, 
but 
> you'll need to use another AMF gateway such as OpenAMF (or you can 
use 
> ColdFusion).  If you use WebServices, you might need a little shim 
> script to get around the security restrictions of the Flash Player 
> (loading data across domains), depending on what server the web 
services 
> are located on.
> 
> >Also, I read somewhere that RemoteObjects is faster.  Is it a
> >signficant increase?
> >
> In general RemoteObjects are faster because it uses AMF, which is 
a 
> binary format and much less verbose than WebServices.  It's hard 
to give 
> a definite yes/no answer because I've actually seen results go 
both ways...
> 
> -d





--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 




--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to