This wasn't a personal challenge. I didn't say you were wrong, I noted that the mxml interface method had a d on the end. I then said UIComponent has an initialized property like the method in the mxml interface. Writing emails to a forum is kind of relaxing compared to the rest of the day. Maybe you should ask me to clarify better before adding paragraphs unrelated to what I was trying to convey.
If I interpreted the question wrong and you can see it (leading a developer down the wrong road), try to clarify the misinterpretation with a question. Mike On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Amy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>, > "Michael Schmalle" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Note :: > > The IMXMLObject method signature is (d); > > > > > initialized<http://127.0.0.1:49487/help/topic/com.adobe.flexbuilder.he > lp/langref/mx/core/IMXMLObject.html#initialized()> > > > (document:Object<http://127.0.0.1:49487/help/topic/com.adobe.flexbuild > er.help/langref/Object.html>, > > > id:String<http://127.0.0.1:49487/help/topic/com.adobe.flexbuilder.help > /langref/String.html> > > ):void<http://127.0.0.1:49487/help/topic/com.adobe.flexbuilder.help/ > langref/specialTypes.html#void> > > > > the UIComponent's initializer is not initialized(), it's; > > > > initialize():void > > > > The UIComponent.initialized is a property not a method. > > It's a setter, which is a method. IOW, you can't implement this > interface with anything that inherits from UIComponent. Not sure why > you take everything I say as a personal challenge, but feel free to > try it if you don't believe me. > > >
