Alex Harui schreef: > > Some code somewhere is trying to set a SecurityDomain parameter in a > LoaderContext. There are parameters like trustContent on SWFLoader > that can trigger that code. Unfortunately you can only run such code > when deployed to HTTP:// and not from FILE:://. You might need to put > in some conditional code to deal with it > > > > *From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *On Behalf Of *Ward Loockx > *Sent:* Monday, November 17, 2008 9:07 AM > *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Re: Security sandbox violation: local SWF > files cannot use the LoaderContext.securityDomain property > > > > valdhor schreef: > > > > Try adding your bin-debug directory to your Global Security Settings > > Manager > > > (http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager04.html > > <http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager04.html> > > > > > <http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager04.html > > <http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager04.html>>) > > > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > > <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>, Ward Loockx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > When I'm trying to load images from a remote server I get the > following > > > error message.. > > > > > > *Security sandbox violation: local SWF files cannot use the > > > LoaderContext.securityDomain property* > > > > > > I've been googling and nothing that works for me. When I put the > swf on > > > the remote server it loads the images perfect! I've tried everything > > > (Crossdomain,addSecuritydomain on application, ...). > > > Someone that managed to solve this ? Looks like a lot of people have > > > this problem... > > > > > > Thanks! > > > Ward > > > > > > > > I added the SWF, but that didn't worked out :( > > Hello,
Thanks for the reply. If I get it right, there is a workaround but requires additional code? Can you specify a bit please ? Thanks, Ward
