Hmmm.... :-) Should read the docs, next time, but still... maxWidth should
be maxWidth irrelevant of parent containers or any other #$%^...

Either way, thanks for the info, I am just starting to get really tired with
flex...

F

On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 6:57 PM, valdhor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>   According to the documentation:
> ======================================================================
> maxWidth property
>
> maxWidth:Number [read-write]
>
> Number that specifies the maximum width of the component, in pixels,
> in the component's coordinates.
>
> This value is used by the container in calculating the size and
> position of the component. It is not used by the component itself in
> determining its default size. Thus this property may not have any
> effect if parented by Container, or containers that don't factor in
> this property. Because the value is in component coordinates, the true
> maxWidth with respect to its parent is affected by the scaleX
> property. Some components have no theoretical limit to their width. In
> those cases their maxWidth will be set to UIComponent.DEFAULT_MAX_WIDTH.
> ======================================================================
>
> So, what is the maxWidth setting of the enclosing component?
>
> --- In [email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "fotis.chatzinikos"
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > When the following comboBox is used with width="100%" and maxWidth 190
> > the maxwidth is not used when the underlying list contains names wider
> > than 190 pixels...Instead the full name is shown and the combo becomes
> > 230 or any other amount of pixels needed...
> >
> > This is only fixed if the width is specified to for example 190...
> >
> > Bug?
> >
> > <mx:ComboBox id="regionsComboID" width="100%" maxWidth="190"
> > dataProvider="{regions}" labelField="name" prompt="{regionPrompt}"
> > enabled="{regionEnabled}" change="regionChanged(event)"></mx:ComboBox>
> >
>
>  
>



-- 
Fotis Chatzinikos, Ph.D.
Founder,
Phinnovation
[EMAIL PROTECTED],

Reply via email to