The book in general has some best practices to pretty much everything. But your CF approach sounds good; we're in a similar situation in that we have a large knowledge management system built in CF - there will never be a plan to redo that in another language, and the flex stuff we build just adds onto the existing 'product'.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Thanks for the advice, Tariq. I ordered the book last week and am looking >forward to giving it a read. Does the book give examples on how to create a >result handler? In terms of CFCs, I'm converting a MVC Fusebox 4 coldfusion >app to a Flex interface. Since the application is allready very large and >there are already thousands of programming hours put into the controller and >model sections, I wanted to re-use as much of my CF code as possible. My idea >is to call CFCs that will have a number of cfincludes, mimicking a fuseaction >as close as possible. I realize this will lead to very tight dependency on >CF, but I'm committed at this point. Do you see any other drawbacks to this >approach? > > -----Original Message----- > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Tariq Ahmed > Sent: Sat 7/23/2005 1:13 PM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > Cc: > Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Flex and CFCs -- problems displaying > recordsets in datagrids > > > > > > >-- >Flexcoders Mailing List >FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt >Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
