Hi Anthony Yes, I had the same idea. I checked the binary size from my build against one built by another user using the same codebase - both had accessibility on and his was about 20k biigger than mine. His is accessible, mine isn't.
So, it's my FB that's no longer including the accessibility classes. As mentioned in my other post, even a reinstall of FB has not fixed this, so I'm hoping someone here has some other suggestions for what might be wrong and how to fix it. I've looked at .actionScriptProperties in a text editor and it has the right config in it. Guy Quoting Anthony DeBonis <[email protected]>: > Try compiling with accessible turned off and get the swf size - when > you turn accessible compile back on the swf size should be a bit > larger. This will tell you if the compile is backing in the needed > classes. If so it may be the client tool you're using to run the > application. Can you give more information? > > > --- In [email protected], Guy Morton <g...@...> wrote: >> >> I had been successfully compiling my app via flexbuilder 3 using the > - >> accessible compiler flag. Then it stopped working, for no apparent >> reason. I tried reinstalling fb but it made no difference. The >> compiler option is still set but now my app gets compiled with no >> accessibility features. >> >> Anyone got any ideas as to why this might have happened or how to > fix >> it? >> >> Guy >> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
