--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "tchredeemed" <apth...@...> wrote:
>
> Basically, right now my setup looks like this:
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> 
> <!-- SECURE -->
> <!-- <channel-definition id="rubyamf"
> class="mx.messaging.channels.SecureAMFChannel"> -->
>    
> <!-- NOT SECURE -->
> <channel-definition id="rubyamf" 
class="mx.messaging.channels.AMFChannel">
>       
> <!-- WWW -->
> <!-- <endpoint uri="https://www.gladhandle.com/rubyamf/gateway";
> class="flex.messaging.endpoints.SecureAMFEndpoint"/> -->
> <!-- <endpoint uri="http://www.gladhandle.com:3000/rubyamf/gateway";
> class="flex.messaging.endpoints.AMFEndpoint"/> -->
>     
> <!-- LOCAL -->
try this: use bindings on the server, port and contextroot after that 
you have to hardcode! I think

<endpoint url="http://{server.name}:{server.port}/
{context.root}/gateway/http"> 
class="flex.messaging.endpoints.AMFEndpoint"/>
>         
> </channel-definition>
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> 
> Obviously, that is not the best way.  I have to recompile this with
> the correct channel-definition/endpoint uncommented depending on if 
I
> am running it locally (development), off our dev server (testing), 
or
> on www (live).
> 
> What would be a better way to approach this?
>


Reply via email to