Hi there, I'm having the same problems but even when reverting the corelib to 
be v 0.90 I'm still encountering the same problems.  Which version of the flex 
sdk are you using and how did you clear any cached swcs from the flex builder 
build directory?

Thanks in advance for any thoughts or helpful hints.

s.park

--- In [email protected], nwebb <neilw...@...> wrote:
>
> Thanks Joesph. Yes, the root tag is Application.
> Turns out it was a problem with the version of ascorelib I was using. Once I
> reverted to V 0.90 the problem went away. I've not looked in to it further
> yet as I'm on a 3 week contract with a very strict deadline (hence ++relief
> at getting it resoved!), but very curious that I should apparently get such
> an error simply from plonking the wrong version of a library in to the libs
> folder. Doesn't make sense, so I am keen to look in to it further.
> 
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Joseph Balderson <n...@...> wrote:
> 
> >   Your root application file needs to be an Application class. If you need
> > a proxy
> > root component, build a custom MXML component based on Canvas and place it
> > inside the Application container.
> > __________________________________________________________
> >
> > Joseph Balderson, Flex & Flash Platform Developer | joeflash.ca
> > Author, Professional Flex 3 | http://tinyurl.com/5qbqlk
> >
> >
> > nwebb wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > My first day working for a client on an existing project. Checked
> > > project out of SVN, but will not compile. I get a series of 1044 errors
> > > like this one:
> > >
> > > *1044: Interface method addChlidBridge in namespace
> > > mx.managers:ISystemManager is not implemented by class
> > > _ToolsBase_mx_managers_SystemManager.*
> > >
> > > All errors are to do with ToolsBase (the main application file) not
> > > implementing the ISystemManager interface.
> > >
> > > ToolsBase extends Application. I've tried various things ... I've
> > > commented out almost all of the code and checked the project settings
> > > and now I'm running out of options. Hoping someone may possibly be able
> > > to make a suggestion or two?
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> >  
> >
>


Reply via email to