I would agree 100%. In my tests XML is a lot slower to use and is especially seen when there are a large amount of rows being returned. If this is over the Internet then I would for sure use arrayCollection. XML is a very "wordy" structure and probably increases the amount of data being transfered by 30-50%. Scott
________________________________ From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com on behalf of valdhor Sent: Tue 3/24/2009 9:05 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Re: which one is better to use? I have found that using an arrayCollection of typed objects is much faster for me. I don't have the overhead of the XML parser. It tends to depend on the amount of data being returned. In some of my cases I am returning 5,000+ rows of data. With typed objects this is around 175KB over the pipe. With XML it was over 5MB. HTH. Steve --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , Vikram Singh <vikisingh...@...> wrote: > > hello friends... > i am passing data request to php using RemoteObject from flex. > and php send back processed data to Flex. > which one is better in performance for flex application operation?? > 1. ArrayCollection > OR > 2. XML > which one is easy and fast accesable?? > all the data are storing in ArrayCollection and used it to displaying in flex > components. > I feel that Array object is little bit slow. > Please suggest me the right option. > > Thanks. > > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to > http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/ <http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/> > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is believed to be clean.
<<winmail.dat>>
