> You can't have bindings in Validators, so the compiler is parsing
> required="{usePurchaseOrder.selected}" to either true or false - and
it looks
> like true from what you're saying. It'd be good if the compiler helper
a bit
> more here, but it doesn't.

I was hoping that wouldn't be the case.  Is there some architectural
reason why bindings don't apply to Validators?  I couldn't find anything
in the docs about why this would be the case.

> We don't think Cairngorm store has any bindings on validators - please
let us
> know if it does.

No, it doesn't.  I modified the store and apparently tried to be too
clever.

> For what you're wanting to do, you're best bet will be to drop into
ActionScript
> and change your validators at runtime.

Okay, will do that -- thanks for the information.

Cheers,

Blake


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
<font face=arial size=-1><a 
href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12h71oldl/M=362329.6886308.7839368.1510227/D=groups/S=1705007207:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1123700056/A=2894321/R=0/SIG=11dvsfulr/*http://youthnoise.com/page.php?page_id=1992
">Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!</a>.</font>
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to