Hi,

the "computer date" tip does work.

But I don't really understand why this alpha version has an expiration date.

Was it planned to release the beta version before the March 31st deadline ?

And what about bug reports if nobody can test it anymore ?

I tried to reactivate the Gumbo builder with my flex builder 3 serial number 
but i doesn't work...

I just want to know if there is really no solution.

Or if you're going to announce the beta release tomorrow ? 

please :)

Romain

--- In [email protected], Matt Chotin <mcho...@...> wrote:
>
> Yep, there have been so many changes since this preview came out that I 
> really wouldn't recommend coding against it.  Code against a more recent 
> nightly build of the SDK.
> 
> Matt
> 
> 
> On 4/6/09 7:32 AM, "Nate Beck" <n...@...> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> You probably shouldn't programming anything critical in Gumbo in the first 
> place.  There are many things that are changing since the Flex Builder Gumbo 
> preview came out, particularly the FxPrefix.
> 
> That being said, you can still go and grab that latest version of the Flex 
> SDK from opensource.adobe.com <http://opensource.adobe.com> , and use mxmlc 
> to compile your code.  I believe some people have been using Flex Builder 3 
> to compile Flex SDK 4 code as well, although I haven't personally done it.
> 
> For what it's worth, even if you went and got the nightly build of Flex SDK 
> Gumbo, your code probably won't work with all the recent changes made to 
> Gumbo.
> 
> HTH,
> Nate
> 
> 
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 6:34 AM, djhatrick <djhatr...@...> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Matt,
> 
> How do we keep Gumbo running? the 'old set the date on the computer back' 
> trick???
> 
> P
> 
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , 
> Matt Chotin <mchotin@> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > March 31 I believe.  We are not going to have the new beta out by then 
> > either.
> >
> > Matt
> >
> >
> > On 2/27/09 2:46 PM, "djhatrick" <djhatrick@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hope it's not March 1?  Just checking...  In case.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Patrick
> >
>


Reply via email to