This is an option but i was wondering if you couldn't use some special
"ninja" keyword telling lcds not to map the field to lcds.
Still, thanks for the suggestion, valdhor
valdhor-3 wrote:
>
> If it were me, I would leave the java and as objects as they were and
> create a new class extending the java object. Now you can add all the
> properties that hibernate wants and send it.
>
>
> --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, ouaqa <a...@...> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I am developping a J2EE/Flex Application and we recently decided to
>> switch to
>> hibernate to handle our database management strategy.
>>
>> The java/as mapping worked real smoothly before. All properties declared
>> in
>> java objects were also declared in as object.
>>
>> When switching to hibernate, i had to add some properties to the java
>> objects, in order to have all my fields declared in the object.
>> So now, the java object has more properties than the actionscript object
>> and
>> therefore, i get a #1056 error when creating the object ("Cannot create
>> property XXX on object myObject").
>>
>> I do not wish to add these missing properties in actionscript so this is
>> why
>> I would like to know how to not map a java attribute to it's
>> actionscript-sided object.
>>
>> sorry about my english, frenchy @ work ...
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/How-Could-I-%22not%22-map-a-property-to-lcds-object---tp23059499p23059499.html
>> Sent from the FlexCoders mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-Could-I-%22not%22-map-a-property-to-lcds-object---tp23059499p23061699.html
Sent from the FlexCoders mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
