So which one is the Ferrari and which the mini ;) One of the biggest advantages of PureMVC has, lies with the multicore build. It allows you to have multiple application cores, and comms between them via a "Pipes" utility...perfect for working with modules...100%...loosly-coupled. Also, I think it's currently ported to 11 other languages, reducing your learning curve if you are considering adventures in PHP, C#, Objective C, Java, Python, Rudy, etc, etc
It really depends of the complexity of your app. The more complex, the bigger the need to use a proven framework. For some time now, I've only been coding with the PureMVC (mostly standard build, except when the project is really big=multicore, or really small=none). It takes a bit longer to set up your project, but once you're there, coding is SUPER FAST, and a lot gets taken care of for you. Some reference to put you on your way: http://trac.puremvc.org/PureMVC_AS3/ http://tinyurl.com/ofgpx8 http://tinyurl.com/o88se6 ...and a great book I would recommend if you are serious about OOP AS3, and considering 'rolling your own': http://tinyurl.com/osr8cl Enjoy! --- In [email protected], "Paul Andrews" <p...@...> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "mhbmarcos" <mhbmar...@...> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 6:44 PM > Subject: [flexcoders] Pure MVC vs Cairgorm > > > > Hi!!!, which is the best option? > > Would you say a Ferrari is best or a Mini? > > If you want to impress expensive women, then the Ferrari would do well, but > if you want to go shopping and be able to negotiate narrow uneven streets, > I'd go for the Mini. > > As it is with cars, the same follows for software. > > Some people like PureMVC, some people go with the Adobe-approved Cairngorm. > > Look them both up on google and check them out. >
