Ok, thanks for the underscore there, Tracy.  Sounds like exactly what I
need.  Basically, at a simple level I'm extending that searchcoders search
interface to a full adhoc query front end.  So the plus minus buttons will
add a row that will have combo-boxes with the data providers --both static
and from a db -- and text entry boxes.  So each row will actually be a
series of sub-  components.   So I guess I could turn the row into a master
component and stick it in the Repeater.  I'll have to look into all these
goodies that the Repeater provides.

thanks again!
brad

On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Tracy Spratt <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
>  “…thought of the Repeater as a simple grid creator …”  That is completely
> wrong.  Repeater has **no** layout functionality at all.  It is simply a
> replacement for addChild/ removeChild, with a lot of extra and useful
> functionality like optional recycling and automatic creation of an array of
> references via the id (myId[n]).
>
>
>
> Look into Repeater before you write all of that code manually.
>
>
>
> One suggestion: do not write any but the simplest repeated content
> ‘in-line’.  Instead, create a custom component and repeat that, passing in
> the entire currentItem via a setter function.  You will find this much
> easier to code, especially dispatching events, etc.
>
>
>
> Tracy Spratt,
>
> Lariat Services, development services available
>   ------------------------------
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On
> Behalf Of *Brad Bueche
> *Sent:* Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:11 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Re: Dynamically Naming Objects
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  Thanks, Amy, I didnt think about that.  I've always thought of the
> Repeater as a simple grid creator but I guess I'll have to read up on it.
>
> brad
>
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Amy <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In [email protected] <flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>, Gordon
> Smith <gosm...@...> wrote:
> >
> > 1. If accessing the ComboBoxes you'll create by an index number is
> sufficient, declare an instance var of type Array:
> >
> > private var comboBoxes:Array = [];
> >
> > When you dynamically create a new ComboBox, simply add the reference onto
> the end of this Array:
>
> Or you can use a repeater, which automates this and will automatically
> handle destroying and recreating all the comboboxes if the data source they
> are based on changes.
>
>
>   
>

Reply via email to