I like the codeoscopic site and especially the transitions from section to section. Would you mind sharing some insights on how you put that together? General approach, that kind of stuff. Animations from one section to another are also very smooth. Nice work.
Thanks, Kevin On 8/23/09 10:57 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > You could go with a full flex site that support SEO. We did it with our site > at Codeoscopic: > > http://www.codeoscopic.com > > but we as well use html to get the SEO capabilities, so you get the best of > both worlds ;) > > for example try to search for "codeoscopic avant" and you get something like : > > http://www.google.es/search?q=codeoscopic+avant&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org > .mozilla:es-ES:official&client=firefox-a > > you can see the web in other devices not flash enabled like iPhone > > C. > > > > 2009/8/22 Jeffry Houser <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> >> >> But, it is largely believed that google does not yet offer a way to search >> the swf content it is indexing. >> >> Can you provide me one example that says otherwise? Ryan Stewart had a >> contest, which just fizzled because no one could get their SWF to show up in >> a Google search. Has that improved? >> >> Nate Beck wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Google already indexes SWF content, they talked about it at MAX last >>> November. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Here is a recording of the presentation: http://tv.adobe.com/#vi+f15384v1000 >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 10:09 AM, toofah_gm <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> If you are a competitor of mine, build a full flex site, otherwise HTML is >>>> the way to go for SEO. ;) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --- In [email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , >>>> "christophe_jacquelin" <christophe_jacque...@...> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > Hello, >>>>> > >>>>> > Is it better to make a full flex site or is it better to add some html >>>>> pages with flex to have a better position in Google ? >>>>> > >>>>> > Thank you, >>>>> > Christopher, >>>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>>
