The nature of Remoting does limit the benifits of frameworks for the backend. Let me restate this. It doesn't warrant anything fancy for the actual Remote Object interface. Of course you should use patterns for business logic but the actual Remote Object interface is just API structure of folders. (ie: com.store.ProductService, com.setup.UserService)
The actual business logic and other backend resources that ProductService and UserService uses to get the correct data is where you can use Patterns. The patterns would probably be more along the lines of Business Logic, Database, State, etc... not UI patterns. So my quick answer is yes and no, does that make sense? Renaun --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Simon Barber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I recently started building an application in Flex using the > Cairngorm > framework. The server side logic will come from ColdFusion but I was > wondering if anyone implements any MVC style framework on the > ColdFusion side? > > I have looked at a few and the Tartan framework has a lot of > similarities with Cairngorm. Do you think it would be worth > implementing an MVC framework on the server side like Tartan for > instance? > > Has anyone done this and had great success? ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/cd_AJB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/nhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
