Hi Dmitri,

Thanks for pointing out that JIRA bug.  I haven't spent any time in design view 
to know if that is effecting me as well.

FYI, I went through the process of renaming my modules (with the understanding 
that the name of the module was my issue) in 3.5a.  No luck.  It seems that I 
could rename my modules to mud, and I wouldn't make a difference:

  Encountered errors or warnings while building project ManagerAlloys.mxml.
    ManagerAlloys.mxml: Invalid component name 'modules.ManagerAlloys': 
component name must be legal ActionScript class name.
  Encountered errors or warnings while building project LabCase.mxml.
    LabCase.mxml: Invalid component name 'modules.LabCase': component name must 
be legal ActionScript class name.


What I did figure out is the the compiler was chocking on a wildcard import:

  import modules.LabCase.*;

Where changing that to multiple individual import statements did the trick.

Seems like a bug.  I'll go JIRA hunting.

Thanks,

Mike




--- In [email protected], "mitek17" <mite...@...> wrote:
>
> Seems like Adobe screwed up namespaces in 3.5
> 
> Here is the bug I filed in regards to DesignView not understanding mx 
> namespace for components.
> https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FB-25994
> 
> 
> I wonder if *anyone* uses 3.5 SDK. I did 3 attempts to migrate from 3.4 and 
> they all failed.
> 
> PS Probably Adobe needs more spanking from Steve Jobs :)
> 
> Cheers,
> Dmitri.
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], "mcaplan_labnet" <mcaplan@> wrote:
> >
> > Hi There,
> > 
> > I'm unsure what is going on, but I can't compile my project under 3.5.  
> > Works fine under 3.4.  I get the following errors in 3.5:
> > 
> > Encountered errors or warnings while building project Alloys.mxml.
> >     Alloys.mxml: Invalid component name 'modules.Alloys': component name 
> > must be legal ActionScript class name.
> > Encountered errors or warnings while building project Case.mxml.
> >     Case.mxml: Invalid component name 'modules.Case': component name must 
> > be legal ActionScript class name.
> > 
> > 
> > Any ideas?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Mike
> >
>


Reply via email to