My point is that there may not be a way using the RSL loading mechanism we provide, because once we roll out RSL.SWF, we never change it so the framework doesn’t support any way of updating it and not having caching problems.
On 4/23/10 12:40 PM, "handitan" <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Alex or anyone, I just want to make sure whether I am clear in explaining the issue that I am facing. Please let me know if my qs and or my scenario wasn't clear enough. Thx for reading. --- In [email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , "handitan" <handi....@...> wrote: > > Hi Alex! > > Great to hear from you as always. > I don't understand what do you mean by framework never revs RSLs? What's revs? > > Proably it would be better for my understanding if I use this scenario: > 1. The following have been deployed: > - Main_ver1.0.swf > - Module_ver1.0.swf > - RSL.swf > > 2. Our clients have loaded and cached thosed in their browser. > > 3. Then all those got update, now it becomes: > - Main_ver1.1.swf > - Module_ver1.1.swf > - RSL.swf <-- this got updated but it's still using the same filename. > > 4. And they all got deployed. > > Now I know for sure our client will get the Main_ver1.1 and Module_ver1.1 > without having them clear the browser-cache manually but which RSL are they > going to get? > Is it going to be the one from Step 1 or from Step 3? > > Thank you! > > > --- In [email protected] <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , > Alex Harui <aharui@> wrote: > > > > I don't think there is support for that because the framework never revs > > RSLs. You can do what we do and publish new ones or use modules and load > > into the main applicationdomain. > > > > > > On 4/22/10 9:15 AM, "handitan" <handi.tan@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > I posted one of this question on a thread that's related to caching but > > since it got hijacked by a totally different topic, I decided to create a > > new thread. If you're going to talk different stuff, please make a new > > thread. > > > > The issue that was raised because client doesn't load the newest and > > greatest of your deployed app because it loads from the browser cache. > > > > To resolve this issue, please read this stackOverfow thread: > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/300757/preventing-flex-application-caching-in-browser-multiple-modules > > > > Now that solution works for the main swf and module swfs but what about RSL? > > > > How do you guarantee that the loaded RSL is the latest one? > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Alex Harui > > Flex SDK Team > > Adobe System, Inc. > > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > > > -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe System, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
